Testing, One, Two, Three

Article 6 of the Constitution is very clear about religious tests:

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

While individual voters might have their own personal religious tests, once again it became clear why, as a country, we need to stop giving public airtime to Values Voter Summit, which is a buzzword for a religious litmus test.  In fact, it all blew up this past weekend, when contrasting the religious beliefs of Rick Perry and Mitt Romney.

Robert Jeffress was unrepentant on Sunday after portraying Mormonism as a cult and urging Republicans to vote instead for “a Christian candidate”.

Jeffress was the clown who co-organized the Reliant Stadium prayer rally with Texas Governor, Rick Perry. The whole point of the Values Summit is to identify the most God-fearing candidate and, as such, the double-speak was rampant:

Perry’s campaign team, distancing itself in public from Jeffress, said the Texas governor did not regard Mormonism as a cult and did not judge people’s religion. “That is God’s job,” his campaign spokesman said.

The heart of the debate is between two cults, Evangelicalism and  Mormonism.  The UK newspaper, The Guardian, said it best:

Mormonism is detested by some American evangelicals because it is “not Christianity” – but perhaps more because it is the first, great, truly American religion. It is founded on claims that no outsider can take seriously, but validated by one of the greatest epics of the settlement of the west, and secured by prosperity and tithing.

Mormonism is clearly derived from Christianity: the book of Mormon is written in a god-awful pastiche of the prose of the authorised version of the Bible, and it was revealed to the world in 1830 in the most fervently pious region of a fervently Christian country.

In response to all the brouhaha, Newt Gingrich added this:

Newt Gingrich, the former House Speaker, told CBS on Sunday that no-one should judge another’s religion. “I thought it was very unwise and very inappropriate,” Gingrich said.

But, Newt, the problem was holding the Christian-led Voters Values Summit in the first place!  The forum was designed to be a religious litmus test.  Radio host Bryan Fischer made that clear:

Fischer, a director of the American Family Association who has made anti-Mormon comments in the past as well as attacking gay people and Muslims, spoke after Romney. He said: “The next president of the United States needs to be a man … of sincere, authentic, genuine Christian faith.”

Not only should no one judge another’s religion, no one should go to the Values Summit and the media should stop covering it!  It has no place in the presidential politics.

In the most recent Congress survey, 6 out of 535 did not respond when asked about their religion.  It is interesting to look  that websites of some of those candidates (e.g., T Baldwin, J Olver), where, instead of false platitudes, they answer directly on issues of the day: Would I vote pro-choice or anti-choice, regardless of my personal views?  Would I support universal health care?  Should the death penalty be an option and in what kind of crimes?  What should be our extended military role in the Middle East?  Answers to these questions tell you much more about a candidate then simply a statement I am a Christian or I am an Atheist (1 out of 535, by the way).

That is exactly why we don’t have a religious test for presidency and why the media needs to ignore the Voters Value Summit.

About SamStone

A Steel City Skeptic who thinks science and reason is the light that we should follow to find our way in this world.
This entry was posted in Current Events, politics. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Testing, One, Two, Three

  1. Pingback: Trust but vilify | Steel City Skeptics

  2. revelmundo says:

    The media should “ignore” the fundie voters summit? I agree. But that’s a far cry from what they actually do. Not only do they cover every nuance of this ridiculous charade all day long, they even invite the looniest of all looney tunes to appear on their shows – con artists, criminals, and fundie psychos – to fill us in on more details that even a semi-sane person would find hard to grasp or comprehend!

    Jackasses, all of ’em. I never watch ANY of the major networks. They’ve gone off the rails years ago when GW Asswipe appeared on the scene. All they do in pander to loonacy and sell, sell, sell. With the exception Olbermann, Rachael, and Ed Schultz, what you see and hear on the political and “news” shows is pure, unmitigated, worthless bullshit.

    If the merchants to truth and sanity are not on at any given time, I turn to Current TV, Democracy Now!, the Science Channel, the History Channel and National Geographic TV. In reality though, I’m ready to too my TV in the trash bin. It’s all going to muck.
    ~Rev El

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s