and deliver us from palin

One Thing, Real Quick: Sarah Palin’s irrational beliefs are absurd. In this article (another version here), she tells James Dobson from Focus on the Patriarchy that “the election rests in God’s hands.”

Dobson asked whether Palin was discouraged by polls showing the GOP ticket behind. “To me, it motivates us, makes us work that much harder,” Palin said. “And it also strengthens my faith, because I’m going to know, at the end of the day, putting this in God’s hands, that the right thing for America will be done at the end of the day on Nov. 4. So I’m not discouraged at all.”

If her ticket loses, will she admit that she & McCain weren’t the right thing for America? Has every president elect been the right thing for America, seeing as how God always makes sure the “right” thing is done at the end of the day? And if God is going to wrap it all up for her anyway, why bother working hard or campaigning?

I don’t think for a minute that Palin actually believes what she is saying here. She can’t believe it, or she wouldn’t be campaigning. It’s like praying when you get sick but going to the doctor anyway. You know prayer won’t work, but you talk about it despite that fact. You go through the motions. You tell yourself it’s powerful when nothing is happening to actually support that belief.

Palin’s statements are the type of mindless spiritual platitudes that religious people pull out of their pockets every Sunday to “encourage each other in the faith.” Without a second thought, they’ll talk about “God’s will being done” and the necessity of working to eradicate some societal “evil” in the same conversation. Perhaps talking about an omnipotent superman makes them feel less helpless, giving the illusion that everything is under the control of a deity that conveniently shares all their individual beliefs, prejudices, and presuppositions (which vary widely even within Palin’s Christian community).

The problem comes when those mindless spiritual platitudes turn into mindless theocratic dogma. Think: California’s Proposition 8. Watch this video of Palin speaking about her support for a constitutional amendment to make gay marriage illegal. Here’s what I transcribe from this speech:

I have voted in Alaska to amend our Constitution to define marriage as between one man and one woman. I wish that on the federal level, that’s where we’d go. I don’t support gay marriage. I’m not going to be up there judging individuals, telling them what they can and cannot do, but I certainly can express my own opinion here and take actions that would be best for traditional marriage, and that’s casting my vote….

Of course. And the KKK can express their own opinions and take actions based on those opinions as well. This doesn’t change the fact that the Constitution and Bill of Rights, which should be defended and upheld by those in public office, exist largely to protect the rights of the minority from the will of the majority. That’s why we’re not a direct democracy, where whatever 51% of the public wanted would become law.

No matter how many people (percentage-wise) want African Americans to become slaves again, the egalitarian laws of the land don’t allow the majority to discriminate–even though the Bible sanctions slavery. Your religious freedom means that you don’t have to associate with gay people if you don’t want to; it shouldn’t mean that you can pass legislation that denies them the same privileges you enjoy. We all have to live together, despite personal differences of opinion, hatred, religion, and preference, in a society that, as flawed as it might be, legally provides equality for all.

Want to impose your bigoted personal prejudices on others? I wish I could say, “Too bad, this is America,” but the presence of people like Sarah Palin in public office makes me realize how dangerously close we are to sacrificing the ideals of equality and liberty to theocratic morons who can’t see the difference between personal prejudice and national law because their heads are buried in hateful bronze-age rantings warmed over for mindless Sunday consumption.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to and deliver us from palin

  1. mikhailovich says:

    Basic issues of equality should never be subjected to ballot initiatives or mob opinion. Civil liberties are too precious for that.

  2. Brandon says:

    Ballot initiatives are basically mob rule. You can point to ones that are good, but on the whole they’re just a way for the majority to bully others around. In a representative democracy and divided government policy changes have to be hard. Politicians need to openly argue their position and then put it to a vote. It’s the same thing with ear marks.

    At the same time, these sanctity-of-marriage initiatives will likely result in a supreme court challenge which should be upheld because they’re so obviously unconstitutional.

  3. BillK says:

    BTW, Mik, I liked your little “Focus on the Patriarchy” thing. That was smooth.

  4. BillK says:

    While it may be true that there have been good ballot initiatives in the past (and perhaps even some lately), that is now no longer the norm. The ballot initiative has become the weapon of choice of many religious assholes seeking to impose their oppressive agenda on this country. The fact that their justification for this oppression is merely one minority interpretation based on their absurd delusions is even worse. I find it so ironic (albeit frighteningly so) that they try to wrap themselves in the mantle of patriotism when in fact they oppose everything that this country has traditionally stood for since its founding. Personally, I think this makes garbage like The Dingbat unfit for public office.

  5. Evan Ravitz says:

    Get a grip on reality! Sure, some try to misuse ballot initiatives, but rarely do they pass -unlike “representatives” who’ve given us perpetual war and debt, torture, warrantless spying, Nafta, the bailout, ad nauseum.

    Ballot initiatives are the origin of most reforms, such as women’s suffrage (passed in 13 states before Congress went along), direct election of Senators (4 states), publicly financed elections (passed by initiative in 6 of 7 states with them), medical marijuana ( in 8 of 12 states) and increasing minimum wages (in all 6 states that tried in 2006). See for more examples and references. The media have seized on the problem initiatives. They generally kiss up to politicians.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s