<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Illusory Pattern Perception</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steelcityskeptics.net/2008/10/12/illusory-pattern-perception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steelcityskeptics.net/2008/10/12/illusory-pattern-perception/</link>
	<description>Drinking Skeptically in Pittsburgh. For Pittsburgh atheists, agnostics, secular freethinkers and all unbelievers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:06:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikhailovich</title>
		<link>http://steelcityskeptics.net/2008/10/12/illusory-pattern-perception/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikhailovich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steelcityskeptics.net/?p=278#comment-224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BigFrank,

Thanks for your comment.

The colored shirt analogy might have been too superficial to be helpful; I was searching for an example of popular superstition that would be too obviously untrue for anyone to take seriously, therefore illustrating the point without someone thinking, &quot;Wait--the light really DOES turn green for me when I wear my blue shirt!&quot;

Also, it isn&#039;t my idea or inference that people who lead less predictable lives will latch on to a higher percentage of random connections that aren&#039;t there; that was the primary finding of this study: people with decreased life control experience higher instances of Illusory Pattern Perception. The results interest me, but I wasn&#039;t trying to make an assertion like that without support.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BigFrank,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment.</p>
<p>The colored shirt analogy might have been too superficial to be helpful; I was searching for an example of popular superstition that would be too obviously untrue for anyone to take seriously, therefore illustrating the point without someone thinking, &#8220;Wait&#8211;the light really DOES turn green for me when I wear my blue shirt!&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, it isn&#8217;t my idea or inference that people who lead less predictable lives will latch on to a higher percentage of random connections that aren&#8217;t there; that was the primary finding of this study: people with decreased life control experience higher instances of Illusory Pattern Perception. The results interest me, but I wasn&#8217;t trying to make an assertion like that without support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFrank</title>
		<link>http://steelcityskeptics.net/2008/10/12/illusory-pattern-perception/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BigFrank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steelcityskeptics.net/?p=278#comment-223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting stuff here, Mikhailovitch.
The human mind is a complicated system - it is always looking for patterns, but it is also quite sensitive to patterns that aren&#039;t patterns and thus don&#039;t work.  Very soon after wearing the blue shirt, the wearer finds it doesn&#039;t make the lights green, and so the theory is abandoned.  True some people hold on to patterns which aren&#039;t there but that&#039;s pathological and not general.  So I&#039;m more optimistic about the capacity of human beings to do good science every day -continually testing stuff that comes at them and trashing falsehoods and recognizing, and building on consistencies when they are really there. I don&#039;t think people need to be trained to do this.  It is part of the complex mental capacities we all have. Surely this must be part of humanism. Otherwise you&#039;re saying that you and other trained people can do it but us Joes can&#039;t.  Also I don&#039;t think the capacity to believe garbage is in any way better exhibited by people who &quot;have a lower standard of living&quot;. As reasonable as your general line of argument is, it tends to under-estimate human beings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff here, Mikhailovitch.<br />
The human mind is a complicated system &#8211; it is always looking for patterns, but it is also quite sensitive to patterns that aren&#8217;t patterns and thus don&#8217;t work.  Very soon after wearing the blue shirt, the wearer finds it doesn&#8217;t make the lights green, and so the theory is abandoned.  True some people hold on to patterns which aren&#8217;t there but that&#8217;s pathological and not general.  So I&#8217;m more optimistic about the capacity of human beings to do good science every day -continually testing stuff that comes at them and trashing falsehoods and recognizing, and building on consistencies when they are really there. I don&#8217;t think people need to be trained to do this.  It is part of the complex mental capacities we all have. Surely this must be part of humanism. Otherwise you&#8217;re saying that you and other trained people can do it but us Joes can&#8217;t.  Also I don&#8217;t think the capacity to believe garbage is in any way better exhibited by people who &#8220;have a lower standard of living&#8221;. As reasonable as your general line of argument is, it tends to under-estimate human beings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

